|
Well, it's that time
of the month--another two
weeks' worth of brilliance completed before we make another page to
resume this Weblog. I hope you appreciate all this trouble I go to for
you guys, and you too, Jessica.
A
friend of
mine recently suggested I was continually blowing my top here; I told
him, confidentially, "It's fake". How else am I supposed to create
traffic around here--paint until I go blind? No thanks.
Don't
try
this at home, though.
Trying to make dolphins into
cybernetic idiots like us with
computer touch-screens. Will
they demand I-Pods next?
I
realized that I neglected to expound on yesterday's entry's title,
"Reverse Learning". This refers to the function of dreams, not to
"forget" memories, but to sort the relative values of synaptic
information.
Apparently,
the only mammalian species that don't dream (reptiles don't) are spiny
anteaters and DOLPHINS. So, the theory is that their very large brains
manage this sorting process by size alone, and that size therefore may
not be directly indicative of human-like intelligence.
When
I say
"human-like", I don't mean to insult any animal species by comparing
them to the President.
Unrelated mammal-spottery; I found this image
of King Kong in the World Trade Center smoke,
hovering right over Satan (from a prior entry).
Also,
because dolphin and whale precursors--the original species that
returned to the sea--did so 70 million years ago, they missed the
developmental revolution of land-based mammalian brains that occured 50
million years ago.
Let
me know
if all this too dull, won't you?
Note the small type--the "Phantom
Menace" is our old friend Osama Bin Laden.
Did
George Bush say "Lucky me--I hit the trifecta" after 9/11?
It's
been
said that the only good reason to raid Social Security funds are "in
times of war, times of recession, or times of severe emergency".
At
least
someone's getting lucky these days.
|
June
14, 2005
~REVERSE LEARNING~
|
|
Not to dwell
inordinately on this "alien"
business, but as one who's always asking difficult questions, I have to
ponder why so much overeaching interest in absurdly fantastic claims
(refer to other recent past entries here) when the fact is that if
anyone wants to take a shot at communicating with aliens, we already
got mountains of 'em here on Earth.
A member of an intelligent, possibly
communicative, fellow Earthling race.
Ex-"Hoffman
Collector" editor Mark Wacko Wilcox
once defended his belief in Alien visitors (and in Bigfoot, Crop
Circles, Pyramid Power and about anything else you'd like to name) by
saying that it all "made life so much more INTERESTING". Think about
that for a minnit.
Another prefabricated myth; the
wandering "Lost Tribes of Space".
This individual is in search of his
lost genitals. Or is it a her?
I SHORE HOPE SO!
There ain't no
arguing with religious dogma, so
ya better know it when you hear it to save yourself much wasted time
and effort.
And yet, I
had to point out that the Universe as it is and as we know it is a far
more "interesting" place than one filled with fictitious fairy-tales.
The trouble is that looking at the actual world. takes effort. Being a
daydreamer doesn't, but then it doesn't usually lead anywhere, either.
More dull reality--dolphin "rings"
that are manipulated in play; somehow,
they don't rise to the surface.
Lots of folks have
made studies of animal
intelligence, and it's a complex topic too big to adequately discuss
here in detail, however, some basic elements are easy enough to grasp;
intelligence can be defined as an organism's ability to survive in
its environment. Even lowly bees rank high by this criteria, and
they communicate well with each other, too. That's been documented.
These funny-looking black things
aren't really my eyes--they're shades,
as I'm supposed to be IN-COG-NEETO, dig?
The human race, on
the other hand, has loads of
technologic gimcracks, but isn't apparently very advanced at not
wrecking his environment, so if "intelligence" can be calculated by
survival prowess, we may not rank nearly as high as we think.
More saintly circles from
the blowhole bunch.
The deep, dark fact
may be that we're just a
bunch of insane monkeys-with-culture who aren't nearly as smart as we
think we are.
And that's
the crop-circle truth.
|
June 13,
2005
~THE WEAK NERVE~
|
|
Ah, here we are
again--another day, another
dilemma. I am amazed at the canny resourcefulness of American
salemanship; any and every possible need met--except really important
ones--and then all sorts of other needs are invented. Like the new
I-Pod, for example, which allows people now to musically channel-surf.
How long until they get tired of that little ride?
More cybernetic trinkets for the natives.
If you think buying an I-Pod is "expressing
yourself", then maybe you really are--but not much.
I once had a
roommate YEARS ago who insisted on
blasting the same song out of his room ALL NIGHT LONG, over and over
again. I was about to deck this chump, and he asked "Don't you like my
music?". I queried: why the fuck did he think it was his--he didn't
write it, he didn't make it, and he didn't own it. All I got was a
confused look.
Regular
"Music" as we have it here today is mainly a way to pass the time, like
when Mommy patted baby on the back to sooth indigestion. This is why
all cars have radios in them; it's a distraction.
Where do I find this stuff? It comes to me
on its own. Does Jesus make you horny, baby?
I personally am in a
state of de-entertainment,
and I recommend it for everyone out there. In a while I'll write about
this idea in more detail.
Anyway, to
get back to the theme of this entry: our commercial society has
mastered the scientific location of weak points in mind and body and
then sets itself to exploit them. No girlfriend? Fat? Ugly? Unhappy in
your job? No status? Tattoo-less? we can sure fix you up, and if you
think you're okay "as-is", then think again--YOU NEED OUR HELP. You'd
have no will or direction of your own without our continous proddings.
It's like a
mommy spoiling a child so it'll always be dependent; however, can you
imagine what might happen if our commercial society focussed on
developing people's STRENGTHS instead of their weaknesses? Think about
it.
Maybe we
wouldn't need mommy anymore.
A quick drawing in the original art
"Mythos" sketchbook, recently purchased
by my pal and supporter Jeff Peterson.
Hey--here's some
good news from CREEM magazine
online; they say I'm "The most outspoken man in Comics". Read it for
yourself here:
CREEM ONLINE
|
June
12,
2005 ~MAINLY
QUIET ON THE FRONT~
|
|
Yep, it may be a little uneventful
here for the next week or two as I hammer out the 15-page tale for this
IDW publisher. It sure feels odd temporarily shelving my "maverick"
status to do work-for-hire, but it's basically a favor to Ash Wood, as
he contributed to some of my publications and was highly reliable.
An unused pic of a "Zeus" missile
for an entry several days back.
If I'd forgotten what it was like
working from a "writer's" script, I am sure remembering now. This thing
is only an adaptation of a Matheson prose story, which I've never read,
so I can't say much about the original. I can comment, however, on this
current incarnation.
More past entry resource material; some
folks claim this is a "real" photo, though
it is quite clearly computer-generated.
Those crazy Germans.
Before I do, I'd like to recount a
script I worked from years ago--there was a scene, a panel,
actually--which called for the artist to show several things at one
time: A man's eye with a reflection in it, while he looked up at a
small, illuminated window at the top of a building. The eye's
reflection was supposed to be the lit window itself. Do I have to tell
you it's impossible to show both an eye and what it's looking at,
especially if it's hundreds of yards away?
More wacko trickery, seeing
hidden "messages" everywhere.
This one's the Pentagon in flames.
Writers are a great thing, I know,
but "writers" for comics don't know shit about what makes for good
visuals or even what is possible.
The script I'm working from now, if you'll pardon my wrecking the
denouement, calls for a final panel scene showing a view through a torn
window-screen, crickets on the windowsill, and crickets on the ground,
in bushes, and in trees--all at night. A cricket is about an inch long,
so to pull back far enough to show a building's exterior with CRICKETS
VISIBLY ON IT is a total impossibility. Did the writer realize he was
designing an impossible-to-realize picture? Of course not, let the
artist SLAVE to realize MY vision! HA HA HA!!!
How much Conspiratorial weirdness
can you take until you simply go away
forever? The Trade Towers on fire.
Other delights in this script: the
main characters are "nondescript", average-looking people; the girl is
not dressed "revealingly", and there is scene upon scene of people just
TALKING. Requests are made that eyebrows be raised, and other subtle
expressions included that "read" perfectly well in textual fiction but
certainly don't lend themselves easily to DRAWN STORIES.
The trend
these days in Comics, in the few "realistic" books I've seen, is to
write as if you're in a movie or a fucking TV program. Some asshole
writer might include in a Comic script "Roger dragged on his cigarette
lazily, while directing an expression of bemused insolence towards
Barbara". All well and good for a novel, but ya wanna try and DRAW IT?
Any fool with
half a mind would just grab a camera and start shooting photos to trace
off, but luckily I draw well enough where I don't have to do that.
"Comic Book
writers"--HA!
|
June 11,
2005 ~STRANGE
CO-INCIDENCE~
|
|
Last night I was organizing
some CD disks, artwork mainly, although there were a few music disks of
mine in there, mainly from the era when I had a very modest 4-track
recorder.
Before I had a professional recording
studio, my "setup" looked like this.
It occured to me that I
should stick at least one of these old "demo"-quality songs on the
website, so I picked "Red Lights", which is actually based on Richard
Matheson's novel "I am Legend". For those of you what ain't heard of
that, it's what a couple of movies have been based on, notably "The
Omega Man" and "The Last Man on Earth".
The book itself--an early printing.
I can recall seeing the
former flick in a U.S. military base theater around 1970; I can date it
from Led Zeppelin's "Black Dog", which had just hit the radiowaves.
I once had the English version of this
German half-sheet on my wall in the 70s.
I didn't see the latter
film version, starring a horribly-miscast Vincent Price, until a few
years ago. It's not generally known that that one was actually shot in
Italy.
A marginally successful version
of Matheson's novel.
At any rate, while getting
this song of mine ready for the website--"ripping" it to MP3 format--an
email arrived from my old pal Ashley Wood over in Australia; at least I
think he's there, I can't prove it. He wanted to know if I'd draw a
15-page strip for a Warren-style horror mag he's editing for IDW.
Nothing to do with this entry, just
something nice to look at; it's
Brigitte Bardot, for you youngsters.
She should have been "Barbarella".
Now, why in the world are
people asking me to draw comics right when I'm getting out of the whole
biz? It came as such a shock that I actually agreed, especially when I
found out the script's an adaptation of a RICHARD MATHESON STORY.
You can
download my original demo version of the song below--don't forget to
drop a coin in the hat.
RED LIGHTS
|
June 10,
2005 ~O,
NEGATIVE PROOF~
|
|
Why the heck is this
guy writing about Flying Saucers, the Illuminati, and various
Conspiracy Theories? Hey, it's not my fault--my kid asked me question,
okay?
Taxi service to South America.
I think it's crucially
important that people be aware of their own gullibility, present
company excluded, of course; you are all highly discerning and critical
thinkers, not to mention skeptical, or you wouldn't be here--right?
RIGHT??
And waitin' when ya get
there--YMA SUMAC.
Anyway, I found a lot of
oddball websites yesterday in my pursuit of some answers to the "alien"
question, so much so that it's certainly grist for more entires here.
Is that okay with you?
Now, I was
already aware of the Principality of New Utopia, which is currently in
planning for construction near Honduras and Cuba; it seems this
particular Utopia has been in the planning stages for some time now,
although memberships are selling fast and very few are left--HINT HINT.
There's a new definition of
"Land"--it can now be UNDERWATER.
Ah, there are grand plans
for this City in the Sea; there's even been a bit of media coverage of
its mastermind, "Prince Lazarus". People just can't seem to help
running away from the reality that the Earth's our home, it is FINITE,
and we'd better learn to work together RAPIDEMENT.
One of many artist's renditions
of the
eventually-forthcoming Oceanic Utopia.
Here's a little quote from
the Official Website, and I should mention that these types typically
seem overly-fond of Ayn Rand, Libertarianism, and other credos
universally popular with the have-nots.
"When
government interferes with the work of the market economy,
it tends to reduce the moral and physical strength of the nation; that
when
it takes from one man to bestow on another, it diminishes the incentive
of
the first, the integrity of the second, and the moral autonomy of both."
Former Congressman Bob Bauman
Personally, I think it's
pretty fucking obvious that a "market economy" that has no checks or
balances makes for a pretty tedious situation as far as Humanity
goes--we're seeing its results at present. Of course, I could probably
find some Thomas Jefferson quotes to back me up, but then I'd be
arguing on the same level as "Prince" Lazarus, now wouldn't I?
"Oceania" from the Atlantis
Project; yet another
artifical island hideaway (floating, this time)
that has has officially bitten the dust.
It boggles my mind how some
people today think solutions to our collective problems are so EASY,
and so SIMPLE--like building an island in the Ocean and starting all
over again. Complete with ready-made doctrines and dogmas, of
course--and a sound BUSINESS PLAN.
Another pie-in-the-sky utopia,
or is
that the derrick-in-the-ocean type?
Welcome to "Sealand", off the coast of
England; heck, my new country is a BOAT.
I'd also like to add that
the above utopian project also has ties to the so-called "Vril Society"
and the aforementioned Nazi flying saucers that we laughed at--rather,
DISCUSSED yesterday.
The friendly "Sealand Business
Club" logo.
Speaking of boats--are you
getting tired of all this yet?--there's yet another "project" called
the "Lifeboat Foundation", which is all ready (sort of) to whisk
humanity away to safety in the event of coming man-made catastrophes.
All you need to be a utopian escapist of this caliber is a website host
and some nifty computer imaging software.
I might add
that taking the "lifeboat" approach to "saving" us from ourselves would
merely be exporting the trouble; can you imagine the only survivors of
Earth migrating to another planet, then filling it and wrecking its
environment, then evolving Neocon politics, then building another
lifeboat to escape it all, then populating another planet, and so on,
ad infinitum?
What
do you
people think planets are, anway? Yer TOILET PAPER?
The laugh--I mean, LIFEboat
foundation's imaginary "ARK I"
Sure, it's easy to laugh at
wackos and quackos, but then there are the better-educated types who
should really, really, really know better; I'm speaking of our
football-bat friends, the new crop of Science-Fiction writers.
These guys
today are all nuts-and-bolts, too many hours in front of
monitor-screen, out-of-touch simpletons; they are literally living in
another world of their own making.
Four of the top SF writers of
today: David Brin, Gregory
Benford, Greg Bear, and the cuddly Vernor Vinge, also known
as "The Moontan Bunch". GO OUTSIDE FOR ONCE, GUYS.
The latest topic in
SF--because apparently there's nowhere left to go--is the impending
SINGULARITY; this ain't a black hole, it's a term used to mean the
point where machine intelligence outstrips the human. When that
happens, you and I will be >CHOKE<
OBSOLETE...
Getting
goosebumps yet? That's the whole job of novelists, you know--selling
exciting books that make your heart jump and pulse race.
Hmm--what
kind of nightmare scenarios can we dream up to scare the dickens out of
people? How about "Gray Goo"--when nanotechnologic micro-machines
replicate nothing but themselves, turning the whole world into--GOO?
Gads--it could happen, coating the globe Sherwin-Williams style, in a
mere TWO DAYS, we are told! Are ya scared, yet? DUCK AND COVER, PEOPLE!
Shades of H.G. Wells' "Red
Weed"! It's
Sherwin-Williams' new logo, all ready
to fly away from the Gray Goop.
Sure, there could be
disasters coming, but frankly, we're in the middle of one right now,
and it is not simple or very fucking exciting--you might call it
"environmental strangulation". It helps to be in touch with reality to
address these problems, unlike the SF boys I mentioned.
These bozos
will never let us forget that dear old Arthur C. Clarke predicted the
use of stationary satellites; well, I got news--NO Science-Fiction
writer EVER predicted the Personal Fucking Computer, our current,
dominant form of technology, and to me that's a pretty poor record.
Now, I do
still have a lot of fondness for the older guys and their space operas,
because they had a certain idealism and enthusiasm that's utterly
lacking today. We sure need another Theodore Sturgeon, too.
Now, if you
wanted to use your fine mind and other talents to try and help avert
global catastrophes, would the best path be to sit in an
air-conditioned box somewhere pumping out "important" SF disaster
novels, to be read by other pale fatties in other air-conditioned boxes
far, far away?
You might as
well face facts on this one, and the fact is--I ain't going to be any
help at all.
|
June 9, 2005
~PROOF
NEGATIVE~
|
|
This morning my
eight-year-old son asked me how UFOs could possibly navigate their way
here, to Earth, considering the vast distances involved. We sat down
and figured out some scenarios with the help of an Isaac Asimov essay.
The distances are truly staggering, but of course, many people have
answers for that, kind of like in "Star Trek", not to criticise that
program.
Scenes like this happen
all the time--the Universe is
crawling with little peoploids who find us endlessly
fascinating, but must hide. Why? Because they move in
MYSTERIOUS WAYS, is why. You can say that again.
We poked around
further doing "Internet Research", because you can be sure that if
there are wackos out there, they're organized and have websites.
Just so you
don't get the idea that I'm cruelly picking on people who believe in
Flying Saucers, I will confess that at one time I thought they were
watching me; that was at the end of a long period of staying awake all
night, drinking and smoking to excess, and eating poorly. Luckily, I
managed to get deprogrammed.
Just to make things easier
to swallow, SOME
UFOs are purported to be man-made.
Well, one website
led to another, and to another, and before ya know it, we were
neck-deep in the shit. To my son's credit, he seemed to lose interest
as the claims got more and more fantastic.
I did get the
chance to explain the notion of "Anecdotal Evidence", which is all
anyone really has in terms of extraterrestrials, outside the typical
fake photographs, fake alien "corpses" and so on; what I said to him
was that if someone has an incredible story without incredible proof,
then it is just that--A STORY.
I quickly got
in deeper and deeper into Darkest Wacko Land, and while I am a firm
believer that the Bush Administration planned and executed 9/11 with
their pals the Bin Ladens (due mainly to the profit and power motives),
I was unready for some of the things I saw...
No question that
something's afoot--there's Satan's fingerprints,
his goddamn PORTAIT actually, in the Trade Towers smoke.
Once upon a time I
had a "#1 Fan" by the name of Mark Wilcox; he actually edited early
issues of the "Hoffman Collector". When he brought up the "reality" of
UFOs and his belief in them, I naturally asked for proof; he said there
was plenty of proof, mountains of photographs, and then proceeded to
tell me wonderful stories about it all.
You know
me--or maybe you don't, but a "story" just ain't good enough to
convince me of anything, at least anything as incredible as a personal
alien visitation. Heck, if I were that easy, I'd be letting Jehovah's
Witnesses in the door all day long. There'd be track marks worn deep
into the floor, fer chrissakes.
Mark went
quickly from being #1 Fan to being #1 Fucking Irritant, so after a
good, long rational attempt to reassure him he was deluded, I gave up
on the whole thing. Mark, naturally, found another swell artist to
adore and attach to parasitically in the figure of Jeff Jones. Y'see,
some people have to like the PERSON as well as the Artwork.
There's evil everywhere,
fer shure, so
there's really no reason to fabricate any.
Image is the NATO symbol and its "source".
Life's no fucking
picnic, certainly, and the evidence is everywhere, even if you're
fairly optimistic and deluded. The damage to bodies and minds is more
widespread and more profound than you might think at first glance, but
the secrecy surrounding abuse tends to keep folks from addressing root
causes. Am I making myself clear? I didn't think so.
The secret, hidden
Pentagram, symbol of
Satan, hidden away in the streets of DC.
If you look at any big city that has diagonal
streets, you may be able to find similar
arrangements. You may not, too, but so what?
Now perhaps only a
small percentage of people actually swear by the "Illuminati"
conspiracies, but others have only marginally removed over-wack-tive
imaginations; it's common to imagine your vote counts, god exists and
gives a shit, and that politicians are your friends and should be
excused from justice and the resultant executions.
More proof of Satan in the
White House:
the so-called "Owl" symbol of the so-
called "Illuminati". YAWN.
So, pardon me if
this has been a chore to follow, but when a kid asks a question, what
are ya gonna do--say it's Santy Claus?
|
June 8, 2005
~THE
PAIN BUDGET~
|
|
Plastic surgery is
up about 175% since 1992, a mere 13 short years ago. While I'm sure
there are many reasons for this, foremost among them must be the
popular desire to resemble famous Film stars; right behind that might
be low self-esteem, poor body image, self-hatred, or whatever you'd
like to dub a very deep-seated personality disorder.
Now, as a
representational artist, I work with human figures all day long, and,
they are quite "normal" by any sane standard; looking around at any
newsstand today, you'll see the obverse--bodies injected, ripped,
raised, doped with horrific, scientific growth serums, ad nauseum, not
to mention COMIC BOOKS. This sort of thing doesn't seem to bother most
people at all; a "new" body, or even an upper lip, is just another
thing to desire, like a Hummer or a tattoo. Are people growing more
shallow, more stupid, or both?
A Hoffman-tailored
animation using George Muybridge's motion-
study photography series from around the late 1800s; this
average-looking man in action is beauty incarnate. No shit,
men can be beautiful too, so you'd better get used to it.
Because I'm keenly
aware of anatomy, and because I have a finely-developed aesthetic sense
(so I'm told), I can say without equivocation that unless a person has
been badly maimed, is deformed, or is a woman with a honker like Danny
Thomas (that lets you off, Marlo), then plastic surgery simply CANNOT
IMPROVE THE PERSON. People are meant to look the way they look, and as
odd as that may sound, it's so; at least from a perspective of sanity.
Is this epitome of
falseness
and fakery attractive to you?
Oh, I've heard the
arguments against, like "people have always modified their appearance
cosmetically throughout History", but of course it's rarely phrased
that well; the fact is that NO culture EVER had an increase of 175% of
ANY so-called "cosmetic" events in barely ten years.
Sure, there
have always been fads and popular delusions, but the fact that they're
coming so fast now that they're piling-up on each other and people
generally are volunteering eagerly for any and every new one that comes
down the turnpike is a definite warning signal.
You're just
not a complete person at birth anymore.
|
June 7, 2005
~LABORS
OF HERCULES~
|
|
Well,
I did it--got the new MYTHOS magazine completed and sent off to the
printer. Now it's a mere wait of a month or so before them babies
arrive back at H.I. We're even going with a cardstock cover this time
around, so it will be a sturdy, studular package for them what likes
that sort of thing.
The man upstairs would approve.
Not
to wreck it all with a "spoiler"-- although most of you are already
aware you'll die alone and unloved--but I did close MYTHOS with the
Greeks' concept of the "Five Ages of Man", which some of you will
recall I wrote about here a while ago.
My
introduction-page art, sans text.
Essentially,
we are living in the last Age--we are the iron race, without shame,
without conscience, and we don't care much at all about injustice or
dishonor. Heck, everybody knows it's Republican versus Democrat,
anyway.
A temple to
Zeus, now lying fallow.
Zeus,
so the story goes, will wipe us out once we completely "hit bottom",
and with the development of the I-Pod, that's literally right around
the corner.
The giant
German atomic particle detector
named for the high-father of the Greek gods.
Then
again, some people think that Armageddon, that horned babe of the
apocalypse spawned by Revelations and adopted by the un-Christian right
as a recruitment scare-tactic, is just around the corner, too.
Then
yet
again, it could be a 50/50 proposition between the heaven-sent and the
nuclear-rent--as in "rent asunder" by man-made atomic annihilation.
My
money's on
Zeus, personally.
|
June 6, 2005
~LEFT
BEHIND~
|
|
It
turns out that due to the immense workload and other unforeseen events,
the "Ballad of Utopia" trade paperback, now titled "Western Gothic",
will not be ready for the San Diego Comic Con, and so I will not be
there promoting it with pal and writer Barry Buchanan.
A panel
from the Gothic masterpiece.
It's
a shame, sorta, but then I'm bailing out of Comics anyway, so what's
the diff? Having the book ready and making an appearance was mainly a
favor for bro Barry B., and otherwise, conventions are very tricky and
expensive affairs, especially for exhibitors.
Anudder
panel from the aforementioned masterpiece.
I'm
in the habit of giving other artists advice--it's well-known that we
typically have great ideas for the OTHER guy should be doing--and have
come to a nigh-inescapable conclusion: Comics rot the mind, especially
if you're drawing them.
I
began to
think of all the artists I know of, and tried to determine whether they
improved over their careers, stayed at the same level, or deteriorated;
I decided that mainly they tend to deteriorate, as the huge workloads
preclude "rest periods" or training to improve skills.
Even
more spooky Western thrills.
The
pattern seems to be, at least today, that the young artists practice
and learn, mainly from how-to books and other artists, and then once
they "break in" they never crack another book. God knows they sure
don't have time to, what with six or eight panels a page for the rest
of their lives.
You
could
make a list with no end--I saw a cover by Mike Grell the other day, who
I never liked (what's to like?) and though he was never really "good",
he's a shadow of his former self; someone like Frank Brunner, a
hopeless draftsman, has probably stayed the same--mediocre. Other guys
who were once the darling stalwarts of Comics have long since lost
their edge, like Berni Wrightson, for example.
So,
kids--unless you can develop a style so simple and
anti-representational that Fantagraphics would jump at publishing it,
do yourselves a favor and STAY AWAY FROM COMICS!
|
June 5, 2005
~NO
BOUNDARIES~
|
|
I
read a bit of a recent H.P. Lovecraft biography over the weekend, at
least as much as I could while "on the throne" here at Camelot.
Lovecraft is enjoying renewed popularity among the so-called "Goth",
Fantasy, and "isn't the Dark wonderful" sets, which is a shame, because
the man clearly had something to offer. It's just too bad people have
to spoil things by getting so silly about it all.
I'm
also
convinced that Lovecraft's depressive moods could, today, have been
vastly improved through better diet and nutrition; the brain needs the
proper chemical bath to function properly and happily, and this is also
why I keep a good stock of unpasteurized beer in the fridge here at
H.I.
The
man of the moment, H.P. Lovecraft.
A
section of the aforementioned Biography reads as follows:
The universe is nothing but a furtive arrangement of
elementary particles.
A figure in transition toward chaos. That is what will finally prevail.
The
human race will disappear. Other races in turn will appear and
disappear.
The skies will be glacial and empty, traversed by the feeble light of
half-dead
stars. These too will disappear. Everything will disappear. And human
actions
are as free and as stripped of meaning as the unfettered movement of
the
elementary particles. Good, evil, morality, sentiments? Pure "Victorian
fictions".
All that exists is egotism. Cold, intact and radiant.
Does
the thought of an empty, godless, impersonal Universe scare you? How
about people who write with sentences that are too short and choppy,
with an over-abundance of periods? The former doesn't, not to me, any
more than waking up and seeing a landscape of sheets and blankets--it's
simply the way things are, and to not accept it is at best childlike,
and at worst, idiotic. The latter is just caving in to and at the same
time reinforcing average people's amputated attention-spans.
And
naturally, imposing some sort of make-believe order on systems that
don't even recognize us helps pass the time.
The
luxuriant abode of the Supreme,
Cosmic, Fictitious Sugar-Daddy.
Christians
and some other dogmatists love to hold other "primitive" religious
belief systems up to ridicule as being "simple superstition", while
they cling to their very complex systems of superstitions. To
quote my aged English uncle, it's all "about as believeable as Santa
Claus". Will humanity ever grow up? Not bloody likely, although England
and some other European countries have higher populations of brave and
intelligent Atheists than anywhere else on Earth, including here.
Here's
some dope's mental picture of the unknoweable
and the indescribable; what's yours?
And,
lest you imagine I'm preaching at you, my main point in all of this is
about EGO; Lovecraft was right, it's the only thing in the Universe
that's actually real to us, and the only way anyone ever leaves their
mark for the Future, whether it's through art, science, music, or by
men's civilisations themselves.
The
next time
someone accuses you of being an ambitious egomaniac, you can rest easy
in the knowledge that you're as fully alive as you can be.
|
June 4, 2005
~FREELOADERS~
|
|
I
don't accept the use of the word "tirade", "diatribe" or other common
and easy cliches trotted out any time anyone feels someone else's anger
is "inappropriate", i.e., it affects their own personal comfort; how
selfish can ya get?
Everywhere,
all over the globe, and in Scandinavia too,
waves lap at or crash upon shorelines as they have for eons
and will continue to long after you and I are gone forever.
I'll
freely admit that most of the "anger" on this Weblog is
manufactured--it's done for the same reason many other people "act-up"
at public appearances, like Harlan Ellison being a big jackass at
conventions, David Carradine being drunk and insulting to the public,
or Billy Mumy being insulting while stone-cold sober, although I don't
believe that Mumy can help it.
What
it is,
kids, is SHOWBIZ, and it's someone bending over backwards to be
entertaining in an effort to create interest so that his wife and
children can be supported in the manner to which they've become
accustomed, that is, eat regular meals. Now, do you feel cheated--or do
you really want me to get mad?
Another
nice painting from the ARC collection,
sent in to H.I. by my pal Al McLuckie.
There
is plenty in the World to be angry about, and plenty of ways to learn
to channel one's own anger in ways that aren't self-defeating. People
are admittedly going berserk in traffic all the time and blowing
others' heads off, but that doesn't mean everyone with a legit beef is
in the same class as a "road-rage"-infected wacko.
You
know and
I know that you wouldn't be here if I wrote about nice flowers and the
pleasant Summer sun, and I divulge the facts--that I am "angry" largely
as part of an act.
You
wanna
fight about it?
|
June 3, 2005
~THE
VORPAL BLADE~
|
|
Finally,
after major printer snafus (and then fixing them being a low priority)
the second issue of "Scarlet Cascade", the immortal, immoral Vampire
mag, is o-u-t OUT. Don't buy it, though--you'd hate it; it's full of
great Art and flying wit, just like this Weblog, if you take out the
Boris, Al Rio, Tom Phlegming, Newton Burcham and so on.
In
spite of
several major setbacks and other travails, the last month has been
good--I haven't heard anyone say "Elvis has left the building", or any
variation of it. Legitimate "Funny" doesn't always stand up well to
repetiton, but fake-funny certainly never does.
It's
here, it's there, it's fucking $7.95.
I
like to poke around eBay in between doing these MYTHOS drawings that no
one seems to want, and I've noticed something very interesting; the
"Comic Art" section, right now, as of this writing, contains 2542
items; however, the REAL Art section has 191,087. Some days it's close
to a quarter of a million.
Oddly
enough,
many Comic Art people have never been to or even spheard of the
regular, "normal" Art section, which dwarfs it by about 75 times.
It's
what's for dinner.
Above
is a sketch I did for the MYTHOS mag illustrating the story of Tereus
and Procne; the moral is that if you allow your son to rape women with
impunity, then he may get served up to you when you're really expecting
regular food, and in complete ignorance you'll really enjoy eating him.
Then
the old
girl herself may show up with Junior's head and hands in tow, just to
make her little feminine "point".
I
can sure
indentify.
|
Pumpin'
out these here "logs" is getting a little wearisome, especially when A.
I ain't particularly mad at anything (due to an inability to
concentrate, due exhaustion, due to overwork), and B. I am getting
tired of the constant, draining workload for no other reason than loads
of prestigious "glory". I am deeply honored.
Feedback's
arriving about lots of past topics; Steve Rude is well-loved
everywhere, unlike yours truly, but I still say he needs a change. God
knows I do. Notice, I only capitalize "god" when it begins a sentence;
that's an ordered mind for ya.
Clever
cartooning from one-time Hoffman International
contributor Randy Mohr, a major talent with little drive and
no ambition to speak of. Can I say that, Randy? Ha ha!
I
confessed to a priest the other day (they're under every rock in
Albuquerque) that I was an Atheist; he said "I admire people like you
who have the courage to go it alone". I replied that as far as I was
concerned, we're all alone whether we admit it or not. The guy was
quite tolerant for a dogmatist, but that's all par today--whatever
increases yer comfort level.
More
balabber
(like palaver) about the ARC "Art Renewal Center" debate, and many
folks confess like the sort of vacuous work displayed there; ya know,
potato chips are okay too, but in moderation, and don't ever confuse
them with actual nutritious food. A steady diet of content-less Art
won't make you fat--except on the head.
A
real Sphinx from Memphis (not Tennessee).
Egyptians
may have gotten the idea of Reincarnation from the cycles of flooding
that replenished the soils around the Nile; there are a lot of artists
out there that secretly believe the same thing, that they will get
"another go" the next time around.
I
hate to
pooper yer parties, pals, but ya only gets the one chance.
|
June 1, 2005
~NOISY
IN HERE~
|
|
The
reason the World's in such a quandary about almost anything you can
name is, I am sure, because its institutions have grown far beyond any
manageable size. Corporations and governments are out of control, and
ya know, they like it like that. There is a good maxim that applies to
almost anything you came name: "Small is better". That goes for
families, nations, companies and so on. There was a good book many
years ago called "Small is Beautiful" by E.F. Shumaker, which is where
I lifted much of these ideas.
Actually,
any
moron can see this stuff--you don't strictly need a book, although it
helps.
The
first Prez in space trepidatiously
heads out for a new frontier--Mars.
So,
as societal life becomes complex beyond average people's ability to
work within it, problems snowball; our last "election" and its result
are a good barometer of the trouble--people are so dislocated that half
of them would vastly prefer a candidate they didn't have to think
about, that they can accept on "blind faith". Well, they got
one--actually, a whole mess of 'em.
Treating
Politics like Religion has distinct advantages for these megalomaniacs;
just as you're not supposed to question religious dogma, it becomes
convenient not to question decisions concerning policy. In fact, it's
actually become blasphemous to do so.
The
modern
method to address problems political is not to think them through, but
simply to take a side and scream.
The
hip sounds of today.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |